Archive | October, 2009

Why the best art is meaningless | Jonathan Jones

If you think art has to have a message to be good, you’re getting it wrong – just ask Bob Dylan

Art doesn’t have to be about anything to be good. In fact, the easier it is to say what a work is about, the less interesting that work becomes. The greatest art takes a lifetime to understand; the slightest takes a moment. And if it really is reducible to an explicit message, is it actually art at all?

I love the scene in DA Pennebaker’s 1967 documentary Dont Look Back, where the young Bob Dylan is interviewed by a journalist who demands to know what his message is. “Walk tall and always carry a lightbulb,” he replies.

Of course, Dylan didn’t have a message – or so he explains in Martin Scorsese’s 2005 film No Direction Home – and the reason he changed his music and lyrics so profoundly in the mid-60s, from the agitprop of his early folk songs to the tumbled words of Desolation Row, was precisely to escape from people who thought they understood him. It was a self-conscious defence of the idea of art.

Visual artists today have a lot to learn from Dylan – or from Mark Rothko, or Wassily Kandinsky, or frankly anyone who has created real art with real art’s difficulties. Yet they could also learn from, say, an 18th-century furniture designer, for beauty is better than a big idea.

The most deadening influence on art in our time is the belief that content matters more than style. If you look back on the artists who have won the Turner prize since the 1980s, or the artists most often mentioned in the media these days, what they have in common is a message. Artists like Marc Quinn, Antony Gormley and Tracey Emin – all have very clear points to make. Once you’ve understood them, what’s left to say?

Real art doesn’t have a message, doesn’t necessarily say anything. It is an arrangement of shapes, a pattern of words. If you want an antidote to this idea of art, watch Bob Dylan manically arranging and rearranging words on a shop sign he and the band spotted one day. That is art.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Sophie Taeuber-Arp: Avant-garde Pathways / Museo Picasso Málaga, Spain

Sophie Taeuber-Arp: Avant-garde Pathways at the Museo Picasso Málaga is the first retrospective of the work of Swiss artist Sophie Taeuber-Arp in Spain. The show presents over 130 exhibits that include paintings, drawings, collages, textiles, puppets, plans, photographs, sculptures and furniture. The exhibition is divided into three sections: Broken Rhythm examines the work from her [...]

Read full storyComments { 0 }

David Hockney: not just bigger, but better | Jonathan Jones

Hockney’s vast landscape Bigger Trees Near Warter – recently donated to the Tate – is a glorious work, not least because it’s so honest about the conditions of its creation

David Hockney is no fool. He understands art history – he has, after all, written books about it. For almost half a century he has succeeded in maintaining a place in the world of art, however unfashionable or odd the directions he happened to be taking. He’s pursued his own interests, and at the same time kept his art in the public eye. And in giving his painting Bigger Trees Near Warter to the Tate he executed a masterstroke. This painting, which has just gone on view for all to see at Tate Britain, will do his reputation wonders as the century progresses. It is a triumph.

You thought Hockney was old hat? We all get it wrong. Art is beautiful because it makes fools of us. You can set up any ideology you like, define taste by any criteria you choose, and a work of art will come along to stand your prejudice on its head. If you prove by logic and erudition that art cannot come readymade, some young philosophe will display the most incredible found object that was ever put in a vitrine. This is what happened to critics 20 years ago. Nowadays, the prejudices are reversed – and so are the surprises. As the artistic ideas of the 1990s gradually sputter out, the life comes from elsewhere. From Bridlington, in this case.

I’ve seen Hockney’s studio there, and it’s just a room in his house, with a view over the town. It’s bizarre to think of him creating the vast Bigger Trees Near Warter in this little working space. But of course, he also has spacious facilities in Los Angeles. Did he make this picture piece by piece in Yorkshire, or finish it in LA? I don’t know. It’s just one of the musings that occur to you when you are surrounded by painted trees glowing in a perfumed light. Pinks and purples, a world under the sky – a largeness that caresses.

Hockney believes that painting must renew itself by confronting nature. It is about hand, eye, brain and heart. You look, you feel, you sketch. Putting his easel in the open air like a 19th-century French landscape artist, he has set out to paint in a pure and honest way. And as you contemplate one of the best pictures he has ever made, you’ve got admit he has a point.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Read full storyComments { 0 }

A Rare Richard Pettibone Moment [Updated]


Richard Pettibone, Katherine Dreier’s Living Room, 1966. Photos: 16 Miles

Why hasn’t Richard Pettibone received more attention? Roberta Smith asked that question in 2005, when he had been working for 40 years, and suggested that “redemption may be nigh” as a result of a retrospective at ICA. Now his career is approaching the half century mark.

Pettibone was doing appropriation — albeit of a more handmade, personal variety — quite a few years before Prince, Levine, and the other appropriationists. Sturtevant is one of his only peers there. Yet, when his name comes up in conversation, he’s often mistaken for Raymond Pettibon (who, to be fair, hasn’t helped matters).

MoMA owns quite a few of Pettibon’s pieces from the 1960s but seems to have lost interest in later years. It’s unfortunate because Pettibone has been producing a lot of smart, funny work since then. This weekend it was a strange pleasure to discover two show’s showing pieces that I had never before seen.

Leo Castelli had up a show of Polaroids that included Pettibone’s snapshots of works by Helmut Newton, Diane Arbus, and Guy Bourdin, as well some self-portraits that featured the artist being reflected back against the lens of his camera. Then, at Francis M. Naumann, the elegant little Pettibone silkscreen was part of the epic “Marcel Duchamp: The Art of Chess” show. It’s not complete redemption, but it’s nice to see that his art is at least still floating around the city.

Updated: Martin Bromirski sent over a link to notes on what sounds like a wonderful talk by Mr. Pettibone from a few years ago.


Richard Pettibone, Helmut Newton


Richard Pettibone, Diane Arbus, Woman with a Veil on 5th Ave N.Y.C., 1968, 1980

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Smoke and Hot Air

0aapetitesmoook.jpg
Image courtesy Laboral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial

I’m having a fairly busy week but i promised myself i wouldn’t abandon my blog as i tend to do when i’m on the road. So… quick post about an installation i was hoping to see earlier this month at Vooruit‘s festival Almost Cinema in Gent. Sadly, i couldn’t make it to Belgium that week. But, youpiiie! Feedforward. The Angel of History, the exhibition that LABoral which opened last Thursday, gave me a second chance to finally get to see Smoke and Hot Air.

Designed by Iranian artist Ali Momeni and Robin Mandel, with participation of artist Matthew Brackett, Smoke and Hot Air reflects Momeni’s concern about the relentless threats that Iran has been receiving from many other countries in recent years.

0amooddborafg78.jpg

The system searches for sentences including the words “attack Iran” on Google News. The sentences go through a text-to-speech synthesizer. The voice is in turn picked up by a microphone, analyzed, and translated into rhythmically corresponding smoke rings from a quartet of wooden smoke ring makers.

Reflecting on the perception of countries as they are shaped by the news and media landscape, Smoke and Hot Air reverses the general view of Iran, which is frequently depicted as aggressor. The recent global support for the uprising after the 2009 Iranian election showed how quickly the general attitude towards a country can shift. Translating the news into old-fashioned smoke signals, Momeni’s and Mandel’s project illustrates how the complexities of national and political identity can get reduced to false impressions, deceit, and posturing.

0alespett89k.jpg

I found the artwork particularly moving. Is simplicity can only be equaled by its efficiency and its peacefulness by the distressing political situation in the Middle East. The quiet and smoky atmosphere incites you to make a pause and reflect on the issue at stake.

Also in the exhibition: Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad 1798-2006.

FEEDFORWARD – The Angel of History is on view until April 5, 2010 at Laboral Centro de Arte y Creación Industrial in Gijón, Spain.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Book Review – Installations by Architects: Experiments in Building and Design

0aaalifeonmmmari.jpgInstallations by Architects: Experiments in Building and Design, by Sarah Bonnemaison and Ronit Eisenbach (Amazon USA and UK.)

Publisher Princeton Architectural Press says: Over the last few decades, a rich and increasingly diverse practice has emerged in the art world that invites the public to touch, enter, and experience the work, whether it is in a gallery, on city streets, or in the landscape. Like architecture, many of these temporary artworks aspire to alter viewers’ experience of the environment. An installation is usually the end product for an artist, but for architects it can also be a preliminary step in an ongoing design process. Like paper projects designed in the absence of “real” architecture, installations offer architects another way to engage in issues critical to their practice. Direct experimentation with architecture’s material and social dimensions engages the public around issues in the built environment that concern them and expands the ways that architecture can participate in and impact people’s everyday lives.

The first survey of its kind,Installations by Architects features fifty of the most significant projects from the last twenty-five years by today’s most exciting architects (…) Projects are grouped in critical areas of discussion under the themes of tectonics, body, nature, memory, and public space. Each project is supplemented by interviews with the project architects and the discussions of critics and theorists situated within a larger intellectual context.

0aahanmstewehel.jpg
Asher DeGroot, David Gallaugher, Kevin James, and Jacob Jebailey, Walking in the Park. Photo credit: Andre Forget (via)

You probably saw many examples of architects installations if you attended the latest Biennale of Architecture in Venice. They provide new platforms for innovative perspectives, ideas and experiments in the field of architecture. Some of these installations will remain at the experimental stage, others might later be implemented into built work. Installations, especially when temporary, enable architects to work outside the constraints dictated by clients and city regulations. The main purpose of installations is not necessarily to be useful but to generate conversations, to invite viewers to reflect on the role and essence of architecture. Installations are also vehicles for teaching and research as the Bauhaus was one of the first schools to demonstrate. Finally, young studios can find in installations a fantastic opportunity to advertise their talent.

0aabbellerjeio9.jpg
Haus Rucker & Co, Oasis for Documenta 5, Kassel, 1972

I expected Installations by Architects: Experiments in Building and Design to be one of those fancy volumes you open to find big, glossy photos and little text to comment on them. I was expecting a beautiful book that lingers on the coffee table for your guests to admire. There are loads of images in the book indeed but there are even more essays by critics, by theorists and by the authors (Bonnemaison is an associate professor of architecture at Dalhousie University and Ronit Eisenbach is an associate professor of architecture at the University of Maryland). Architects get to give their own view as well. The book is divided into five chapters that explore a different area of discussion. Each of them is illustrated by 8 to 10 architectural installations (this post picks up one of them for each chapter):

1. Tectonics: by exploring new modes of assembly and materials, this section reminds us that architecture doesn’t stop at the facade.

0aavivivsecci9.jpg
Mette Ramsgard Thomse, Vivisection

Mette Ramsgard Thomse’s Vivisection is a spatial experiment that explores how a techtonic surface can embed a capacity for sensing and actuation. The silk and steel fabric is conductive thereby allowing the architects to pass electronic signals through it. By using antenna based sensor chips the fabric “feels” the presence of the audience. The sensors inform a network of distributed micro-computers, that in turn control the fans, inflating and deflating internal bladders in the structure.

2. Body examines the relationship between human body, spatial experience and design.

0atumatoutdonnnjk.jpg
Thom Faulders, Mute Room (image)

Thom Faulders covered with pink Memory Foam (as used in the earplugs that expand to fill the cavity of the ear) the floor of his Mute Room, a temporary listening environment for experimental electronic music. The foam’s surface operates as a sound baffle to enhance acoustical clarity. Similar to the way that musical notes ‘decay’ in the air before dissipating, this surface has a transitory quality – impressions linger until fully erased by the slowly acting foam.

3. Nature might help shape a more responsible attitude towards nature.

0apparirieladdr.jpg
Anderson Anderson with Cameron Schoepp, Prairie Ladder

The Prairie Ladder was commissioned by the Connemara Conservancy (Texas) to preserve, protect, and honor the prairie landscape.

The ladder introduces a veritcal axis, making a departure from the natural horizontal axis of the prairie. The ladder also proclaims human defiance of the horizontal limitations of the earth.

4. Memory engages with the collective memory and its relationship with space.

0aasrtkinsdt.jpg24260 in “art and Economy at Deichterhollen, Hamburg, 2002

Since 1960, Detroit has lost half of its population and demolished over 200,000 housing units. Kyong Park‘s 24620: The Fugitive House (2001-), is an abandoned house from Detroit that has been dismantled and reconstructed in several European cities. 24620 is looking for a new home in a ‘kinder and gentler” city than Detroit. Europe, however, is becoming just as neo-liberal and neo-con as in the USA

With its pieces misplaced and their incisions permanent, the house, when re-assembled, replicates the condition of a dysfunctional city in the violence of dismembered spaces. Wherever it may go, the house takes the ideals and failures of modernism with it, creating discourses on the cultural state and destiny of each community.

5. Public Space offers citizens new ways to inhabit or relate to the city.

0aaskyearjkjkkj.jpg
Usman Haque, Sky Ear, 0n September 15, 2004 at the National Maritime Museum, Greenwich Park, London

Sky Ear, by Haque Design + Research, contains miniature sensor circuits that respond to electromagnetic fields, particularly those of mobile phones. When activated, the sensor circuits in the clouds co-ordinate to cause ultra-bright coloured LEDs to illuminate thousand glowing helium balloons.

Related book reviews: Bright: Architectural Illumination and Light Installations, Spacecraft Fleeting Architecture and Hideouts and Ground-up City. Play as a Design Tool.

Image on the homepage: land(e)scape (Savonlinna, Finlandia – 1999) by Marco Casagrande and Sami Rintala.

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Mutate Britain – last few days this weekend

MuTate Britain’s ‘One Foot In the Grove’ closes this weekend  so its the final opportunity to see the show if you haven’t been already. Most of the artists in the show have work on sale including Dotmasters, Carrie Reichardt and Eelus. Eelus’s ‘Nesting’ piece (pictured below) is now available from both the MuTate show and on his website.


Mutate has a couple of events lined up to coincide with the closing of the show. On Friday evening the film ‘Carnival’ by Don Letts will be shown and on Saturday night Don will be on the decks while the flaming mutoids will be strutting their stuff again.


More MuTate pics here.



‘Nesting’ by Eelus



Mutate Britain – Acklam Road, Portobello Grove, London



Tony Blair by War Boutique

Read full storyComments { 0 }

Contemporary art should lose the hype | Jonathan Jones

The fanfare for this autumn’s exhibitions belies the forgettable nature of much of the art – and drowns out any serious criticism

So, that happened. In a blinding flash of fuss, London’s galleries and museums simultaneously launched their autumn events, greeted by the now traditional crop of seasonal arts features declaring the British to be a nation in love with modern art. But what does it all add up to?

Get down to brass tacks and the most hyped event was a failure by Damien Hirst, a colossal self-exposure and an enormous joke on those of us who have tried to defend our youthful attachment to his work. But it was not the only disappointment. Serious fans of contemporary art might have wanted to contrast his farcical old master paintings with the sombre installation by Miroslaw Balka in Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall. But that too is a grandiloquent misfire. My first reaction was to praise Balka and attack his audience. I was wrong. It’s the work that doesn’t give its public enough.

The more noise art makes, the less it seems to matter. Taking in all this art is like remembering everything you’d see on the conveyor belt in The Generation Game – and about as rewarding. Once you’ve spotted the toaster, the Ryan Gander photographs, the Charles Avery drawings and the Grayson Perry tapestry, what’s left to meditate on? Is any of it even worth telling Brucie about?

I don’t believe great art thrives on endless hype and hysteria. I don’t believe young talents are served by such babble. I believe new art needs a concentrated, serious, critical culture. There are the rudiments – or the remains – of culture in this country.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Read full storyComments { 0 }

“Marcel Duchamp: The Art of Chess” at Francis M. Naumann Fine Art [Photographs] [Updated]


Salvador Dali, chess set designed in honor of Marcel Duchamp, 1971. Photos: 16 Miles [more]

Holland Cotter was on top of Francis M. Naumann’s current show about Duchamp, chess, and contemporary art this weekend, but it’s worth another note. This is one of the most fun shows in New York right now. It takes a ton of Duchamp ephemera (chess notations, a few letters, a few editions and pieces of art), adds a ton of chess sets (by Dali, Man Ray, Ono, and others), and includes other chess-related pieces of contemporary art. Here are a few of the chess sets. The show closes after Friday.

The pieces of the Dali chess set above were molded from his own fingers. (The rook is the pepper shaker from the St. Regis Hotel.) In a 1971 letter to Sidney Wallach of the American Chess Association, Dali explained the design he had completed in honor of his late friend Duchamp: “In chess, as in other expressions of the human alchemy, there is always the creator, above all, the Artist as Creator. It is this that I wanted to be represented: the hand of the Artist, the Eternal Creator. How better to express this vision than by sculpting my own hand, my own fingers?”

One wonders if Maurizio Cattelan knew about the piece. The edition he created donors to the X-Initiative (below) — which plays so nicely with some of Bruce Nauman’s sculptures — is a perfect complement to Dali’s set.

Updated: Writer Brian Sholis has written in to mention that Maurizio Cattelan has developed a choice chess set himself. The opposing kings take the form of Hitler and Martin Luther King, Jr. View an image and learn more.


Maurizio Cattelan’s hand, edition of 80, available to X-Initiative donors, on display at X.


Yoko Ono, Play It By Trust, 2002


Charles Juhasz-Alvarado, Readymade Chess Set, 1995


Arman


Arman


Man Ray, Bronze Chess Set, 1966


Man Ray, Silver Chess Set, 1926/2008

“Marcel Duchamp: The Art of Chess”
Through October 31, 2009
Francis M. Naumann Fine Art
24 West 57th Street, Suite 305
New York, New York
[more photographs]

Read full storyComments { 0 }